Welcome to Rutabaga’s Reads 2013: Part 2. Thanks to everyone
who left comments about books you’ve read or are looking forward to reading.
Beautiful Redemption (Oct. 23, 2012) by Kami Garcia & Margaret Stohl.
Beautiful Redemption (Oct. 23, 2012) by Kami Garcia & Margaret Stohl.
The first novel in the series, Beautiful Creatures, is a motion picture that will hit theatres on
Valentine’s Day. Will you read the books now? Won’t you? Either way, I don’t
want to put in spoilers. But please indulge me as I blurt out a smattering of
words regarding this fourth and final novel.
Curses and
secrets. Trials and tribulations. A button like a pile of bricks. Cake like
cement. Love. Regret. Fear. Hope. Pain. Determination. Two times goodbye.
Always loved.
Confused?
Read the books! Know what I’m talking about? Post a comment! When you enjoy a
series, there is always something a little sad about reading the last lines of
the last book. But “Beautiful Redemption” is executed well. Occasionally it
borders on almost-too-sappy, but at the same time, that sappiness helps carry a
main character through the book. Love conquers all. Love supersedes all. For
Ethan and Lena, love feeds their story of beautiful redemption.
I saw the movie well before I read this book, but that
didn’t make reading the book any easier. Bruno is the nine-year-old son of a
commandant-father who’s been assigned leadership of “Out-With,” a concentration
camp in Poland, by the “Fury.” Bruno has led a sheltered life when it comes to
his father’s “job” and is therefore naïve about the land beyond the fence. His naïveté
holds even when he meets Shmuel, one of the multitude in striped pajamas beyond
the fence. He doesn’t realize the awful reality of why Shmuel “lives” there. He
only wants to play games with him. Will Bruno visit Shmuel? Even though that
would be forbidden? … And No Exceptions?
Despite the
extremely tough subject, it is not a graphic book. The storytelling is simple
when the history is not. It is haunting and poignant. The story is seen from
the viewpoint of a nine-year-old … but it’s certainly not a book for
nine-year-olds. Junior high students and above, perhaps. Whatever you think or
feel about the book, I anticipate that you’ll find it thought-provoking and
discussion-worthy.
Tom and Abby Stuart led seemingly idyllic lives until their
twelve-year-old daughter, Caitlin, vanished. Abby has made plans to move on,
but Tom refuses to believe she’s dead. Four years later, Caitlin is found
alive. Already a child who disclosed little, she refuses to give up details as
a now-sixteen-year-old. Tom’s desperate to get the facts, Abby is torn between
the alive-Caitlin and the memorial-service-honored-Caitlin, and other
characters involved range in level of interest. What truths will be uncovered?
And what does Caitlin’s attitude toward her captor say about her
psychologically?
“Cemetery
Girl” did not capture my interest. My lack of interest in the novel was due to
annoying characters (the only character I liked was the dog) and a lack of the
unexpected, though the storyline initially appeared promising. The book isn’t
good, bad or ugly. It’s just okay.
(For those
concerned, there are multiple instances where one might want to clean
characters’ mouths out with soap.) (Adult fiction.)
Blue-haired Karou is back in the sequel to “Daughter of Smoke & Bone.” She is tasked to create revenants for the chimaera and is
stuck in a “land of dust and starlight.” She is supremely angry with Akiva. The
seraphim and the chimaera are ever at each others’ throats -- and too often,
quite literally. Is there any end to the slaughter occurring on both sides? Why
does so much blood spill? For vengeance? For power over the land of Eretz? For
sick sport?
Akiva struggles,
too. He’s disgusted with himself and with his “people” (the seraphim). He’s
torn and broken, but he’s also hopeful and sympathetic. “Mercy breeds mercy,”
he says, and it begins with himself. Will other seraphim take to his cause? And
help the “enemy?”
This
installment is as terribly violent as it is exquisitely imagined. It’s cunning.
Brutish. Brutal. And yet beautifully written. “Death, death, death,” I said
aloud one night, succinctly summing up what was happening and the violence of
it, the carelessness and ugliness of it. This is not a book for the
faint-hearted. Fortunately, Karou’s tiny, ferocious friend, Zuzana, brings much-needed
humor to the story. I am definitely looking forward to the concluding novel!
The story is told from Jacob Jankowski’s point-of-view. He
is ninety. Or ninety-three. One or the other. Most chapters center on his life
as a twenty-three-year-old almost-veterinarian. He finds himself employed as
part of the Benzini Bros Most Spectacular Show on Earth as their vet. However, employed is a loose term, as he never
gets paid. The circus isn’t just a circus of performers and animals, but bosses
as well. There’s circus owner Uncle Al, who’s desperate to be like the Ringling
Bros; superintendent of animals August Rosenbluth, who’s as charismatic as he
is violent; and Marlena, August’s wife and a star circus performer. Jacob is
immediately drawn to Marlena, which is most noticeable due to August’s extreme
paranoia. When August’s abuse gets out of hand, and it’s seen that Uncle Al
only cares about his circus, will Jacob heed his employer’s demands? Or will he
attempt to do what he feels is right?
“Water
for Elephants” is as much an historical romance novel (Great Depression Era) as
it is a novel of self-discovery and mental growth. I didn’t love this book, and
sometimes, I didn’t even like it, but it is vivid and well-written. It’s not
always an easy book to read. The novel volleys from charming to intense and
from honest to sleazy, sometimes all within the same chapter. (For those who
might like a heads-up, there are occasions of explicit material and expletives.)
This is not a relaxed read, but it is rich in detail. What was your take on
this book?
I just noticed this and don't feel like signing back in. So. Please note the cover photo I have for "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas." The version of the book I read does say "Pajamas," as opposed to the photo I used, which uses "Pyjamas." Either is correct, but you'll see "Pajamas" on the cover in the U.S. English version.
ReplyDeleteWater for Elephants: I really enjoyed this book. I loved getting a glimpse of what it was like to be part of a traveling circus during that time period. I can honestly say that Rosie is my favorite character. I read this book before I saw the movie. The book is way better in my opinion. Though I did like both versions. I found my copy at the library used book store.
ReplyDelete